F17: Opposing the Government 'Power Grab' on Planning

Motion as passed by conference

Opposing the Government 'Power Grab' on Planning

ALDC
Mover: Cllr Susan Juned.
Summation: Mayor Peter Taylor.

Conference notes that:

  1. The Government is consulting on plans to overhaul the planning system.
  2. The reforms to existing planning rules would allow fast track permissions for offices and retail centres to be converted to houses; and extra storeys to be added to existing housing and flats.
  3. The assessment of local housing need and the threshold below which developers are required to contribute to affordable housing will also be changed.
  4. In the future reforms proposed in the Planning for the Future consultation published on the 6 August 2020, land will be categorised into growth, renewal or protection zones;
    1. 'Growth' areas will allow planning permission in principle if a site is designated a development site in the local plan.
    2. 'Renewal' areas will be subject to a statutory 'presumption in favour of development'
    3. 'Protection' areas will be where development will be discouraged.
  5. The Government has already laid new regulations allowing Permitted Developments that do not provide adequate environmental standards to counter Climate Change dangers.

Conference recognises:

  1. The need to build more housing to prevent homelessness and provide adequate, affordable and suitable accommodation for everyone, and the failure of successive governments to address the issue.
  2. That councils currently approve nine in ten applications.
  3. That the Local Government Association findings show that over a million homes have planning permission but remain unbuilt.

Conference believes that:

  1. The planning system is not the cause of low build-out numbers.
  2. These proposals reduce democratic accountability and public scrutiny undermining the ability of councils to determine planning applications.
  3. These proposals significantly reduce the scope for public participation and influence on planning applications within local communities.
  4. The proposed changes would favour development interests over those of local communities.
  5. Delegation of detailed planning decisions to planning officers, rather than a democratically elected planning committee fails to recognise the role that public democratic scrutiny has in ensuring decisions are fair, transparent, with any impacts fully considered.
  6. The reforms restrict a planning authorities' ability to set local planning policies in line with the needs of their area and community aspirations, undermining the plan-led system, disempowering councils and communities.
  7. Replacing the Community Infrastructure Levy and Section 106 payments with centrally imposed housing targets and a national levy, will likely result in less money for affordable housing, sustainable transport and other critical infrastructure.
  8. The effort to speed up applications risk watering down or removing the requirement altogether for Strategic Environmental Assessments, Environmental Impact Assessments and similar assessments.
  9. The proposals do not sufficiently take into consideration the Climate Change Act 2008 provisions that address carbon dioxide emission standards for future housing stock.
  10. The proposals put at risk archaeology and heritage by undermining pre-commencement archaeological conditions in the development process.

Conference reaffirms the commitment of the Liberal Democrats to:

  1. Empower local democracy.
  2. Provide the infrastructure the country needs.
  3. Provide truly affordable good quality housing.
  4. Support housing with high standards of design, amenity, space.
  5. Achieve the smallest possible carbon footprint from housing.

Conference strongly objects to these proposals and urges all Liberal Democrats - including the party's councillors, MPs in England and those elected at any other level - to participate in the consultations and to reject the arbitrary housing targets and reduction of local control proposed in the consultation paper.

 

Applicability: England.

 

This motion was selected for debate from the emergency motion ballot as item F17 at 10:00 on Sunday 27 September.

This website uses cookies

Like most websites, this site uses cookies. Some are required to make it work, while others are used for statistical or marketing purposes. If you choose not to allow cookies some features may not be available, such as content from other websites. Please read our Cookie Policy for more information.

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.
Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
Marketing cookies are used by third parties or publishers to display personalized advertisements. They do this by tracking visitors across websites.